1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 1 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | Belmont | Integra |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2130 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |