1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 450 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.

Compare all specifications: