1968 Holden Belmont vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 420 (87 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 11 kg more than 1998 Rover 420.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 420 (184 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 1998 Rover 420 | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | Belmont | 420 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2130 cc | 1992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1189 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |
