1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (76 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1968 Holden Belmont has manual transmission. 1968 Holden Belmont will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Holden | Matra-Simca |
Model | Belmont | M72 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |