1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (407 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. 1968 Holden Belmont has automatic transmission and 2001 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Holden Belmont will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Belmont | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2380 mm |