1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2001 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2001 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 545 kg more than 2001 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 2001 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Holden | ZAZ |
| Model | Belmont | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3043 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2330 mm |
