1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 450 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 2002 Honda Acty | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Belmont | Acty |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3043 cc | 660 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2460 mm |
