1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 180 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Belmont | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Belmont | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3043 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 246 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |
