1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2004 Toyota Camry

To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (164 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 260 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Belmont.

Compare all specifications: