1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,130 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 70 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (163 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (162 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Belmont | Almera |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2130 cc | 1769 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1130 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2540 mm |