1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Holden | Isuzu |
Model | Belmont | KB |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3043 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3060 mm |