1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 245 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Belmont | Etude |
Year Released | 1968 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3043 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 246 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |