1968 Holden Belmont vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (181 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (407 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Colorado. 1968 Holden Belmont has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Holden Belmont will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Belmont | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Belmont | Colorado |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |