1968 Holden Brougham vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Brougham would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1968 Holden Brougham. (182 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Brougham.
Because 1968 Holden Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Brougham (407 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (260 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Brougham | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | 6 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |