1968 Holden Monaro vs. 1999 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1999 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota 4Runner (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota 4Runner (290 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (213 Nm). This means 1999 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Monaro | 1999 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Monaro | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |