1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2000 Saturn L

To start off, 2000 Saturn L is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saturn L (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Saturn L weights approximately 154 kg more than 1968 Holden Monaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Saturn L (257 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2000 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.

Compare all specifications: