1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Monaro (108 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Monaro weights approximately 325 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (245 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications: