1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,024 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Monaro (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Monaro weights approximately 175 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Monaro | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Monaro | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5024 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2540 mm |