1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (215 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (443 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Monaro | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Monaro | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 443 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |