1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2004 Honda Element
To start off, 2004 Honda Element is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Element (160 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Element should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Element, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Honda Element (218 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (213 Nm). This means 2004 Honda Element will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Holden Monaro | 2004 Honda Element | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | Monaro | Element |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2638 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 213 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2580 mm |