1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,024 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Monaro | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Monaro | Clio |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5024 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
