1968 Holden Monaro vs. 2012 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2012 Renault Koleos is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Koleos (148 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Because 2012 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Holden Monaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Koleos (320 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (213 Nm). This means 2012 Renault Koleos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Holden Monaro | 2012 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Monaro | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2638 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 213 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2690 mm |
