1968 Humber Sceptre vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,723 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Humber Sceptre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1968 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1968 Humber Sceptre.
Because 1968 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Humber Sceptre | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Humber | Ford |
Model | Sceptre | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1723 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |