1968 Humber Sceptre vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1968 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Humber Sceptre.
Because 1968 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Humber Sceptre. (123 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Humber Sceptre | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Humber | Holden |
| Model | Sceptre | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1723 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2685 mm |
