1968 Humber Sceptre vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,723 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Humber Sceptre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1968 Humber Sceptre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 459 kg more than 1968 Humber Sceptre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Humber Sceptre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Humber Sceptre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Humber Sceptre | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Humber | Volvo |
Model | Sceptre | C30 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1723 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 992 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |