1968 Isuzu 117 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu 117. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu 117 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu 117. (100 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu 117. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 315 kg more than 1968 Isuzu 117. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu 117. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu 117.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Isuzu 117 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Isuzu | Tata |
Model | 117 | E |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1818 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2810 mm |