1968 Isuzu 117 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu 117. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu 117 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu 117. (100 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu 117. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 745 kg more than 1968 Isuzu 117. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu 117. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu 117.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Isuzu 117 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
Model | 117 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1818 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 78 L |