1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 83 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1968 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Rover |
| Model | Bellel | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1978 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1212 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 54 L |
