1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2000 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 100 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2000 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Bellel | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2464 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 57 L |
