1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP) has 241 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Isuzu | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Bellel | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5379 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 322 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 499 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |