1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2004 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 SsangYong Rexton (210 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 605 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 SsangYong Rexton (318 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2004 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | Isuzu | SsangYong |
| Model | Bellel | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3199 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |
