1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (148 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 550 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Isuzu | Chevrolet |
| Model | Bellel | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1990 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |
