1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (381 HP) has 300 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 533 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (548 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
Model | Bellel | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5654 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 381 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1828 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |