1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 255 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Bellel | Colt |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1500 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 47 L |
