1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1021 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (226 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
| Model | Bellel | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2488 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2316 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |
