1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 522 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Isuzu | Cadillac |
Model | Bellel | XTS |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3564 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 314 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |