1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP) has 254 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 707 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | Bellel | XF |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2995 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2909 mm |