1968 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP) has 205 more horse power than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1069 kg more than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Isuzu Bellel | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Bellel | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 286 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2364 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2154 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 93 L |
