1968 Jaguar 240 vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1980 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar 240 | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Jaguar | Plymouth |
Model | 240 | Reliant |
Year Released | 1968 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2260 mm |