1968 Jaguar 240 vs. 2012 Nissan Note
To start off, 2012 Nissan Note is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar 240 (131 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 388 kg more than 2012 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar 240 | 2012 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | 240 | Note |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2600 mm |
