1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 590 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar E Type | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | E Type | Colt |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2310 mm |
