1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 10 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar E Type | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | E Type | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1968 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |