1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 1988 Renault 25
To start off, 1988 Renault 25 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1988 Renault 25. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault 25.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar E Type | 1988 Renault 25 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | E Type | 25 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 90 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |