1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 780 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar E Type | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | E Type | MK VI |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |