1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar E Type | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | E Type | SS |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 96.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
