1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 1996 Saturn SL
To start off, 1996 Saturn SL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 344 kg more than 1996 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar E Type | 1996 Saturn SL | |
Make | Jaguar | Saturn |
Model | E Type | SL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1400 mm |