1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2004 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 580 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar E Type | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Jaguar | MCC |
Model | E Type | Smart |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2370 mm |