1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 2011 Audi A7

To start off, 2011 Audi A7 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2011 Audi A7. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi A7.

Because 2011 Audi A7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar E Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Jaguar E Type 2011 Audi A7
Make Jaguar Audi
Model E Type A7
Year Released 1968 2011
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4235 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 226 HP 201 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4968 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1190 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2913 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]