1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 2011 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2011 Ford Explorer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Explorer (290 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar E Type | 2011 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | E Type | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5006 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1788 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |
