1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 2012 Audi S5
To start off, 2012 Audi S5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S5 (354 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi S5 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi S5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar E Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar E Type | 2012 Audi S5 | |
Make | Jaguar | Audi |
Model | E Type | S5 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 354 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4623 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1382 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |